You still improve from working through the build on your own even if it's not original, just like you still usefully improve your logical reasoning skills by working through a math proof that millions of other pupils have already completed. The point of homecooking is not to be original, the point is to build understanding instead of chasing the quick cheap hollow rush of short term "results". I come from chess, a game that has been around for a much longer forever than Magic, so I am aware of how hard it is to come up with even a minor novelty (as in, something that is at least arguably an improvement, not simply a new move) in an obscure & marginal corner of the meta. people have built better for longer than you can. More times than not the deck you think you made is already part of a meta shell anyway. You can still learn a lot from trying to beat Reid Duke's deck even if it's one of his stunt doubles piloting it. And, it allows a ton of people who are either not interested in or not good at deckbuilding to still play and enjoy the game (and experience a fantasy of being good at it).Īnyway, you'll never be Actually Good At MtG until you can homecook stuff that beats the meta decks, so you might as well embrace the pain. I try to look on the bright side: it's a chance to play against a better deck than I would otherwise get to play against at my level. At least, I try to tell myself that, as annoying as it can be. But, I mean, it's also fine if people want to do that. That's very different from your opponent copying a deck that someone else built. I don't think any reasonable MtG player would object to someone homecooking a deck that's better than theirs. Publicado originalmente por Kacey:mtg players be like "STOP BUILDING DECKS BETTER THAN MY MID >:("
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |